CFAA says doesn't require intent, you use a computer system the way it "wasn't intended", you're liable.

What are the token reset shenanigans?

From what I see, a lot of people were angry at Anthropic's limits with the subscription plan. OpenAI had some issue I can't remember, and they reset people's token usage (for the session or weekly limits). I think they got a lot of good press, now OpenAI seems to just do it at random when they want a PR boost. It makes scheduling your worklife a bit difficult if you are limited by that.

There are a lot of us who just use the AI on projects until the session limit hits, and wait for the usage to reset.

> There are a lot of us who just use the AI on projects until the session limit hits, and wait for the usage to reset.

Do you mean that you can't continue on your own until the reset?

Well, I was happily paying $300 canadian pesos per month to OpenAI for some time... until the tokens just dried up overnight for some reason.

I went from using it non-stop all day every day for months, to running into my weekly limit within 24 hours almost overnight.

They lied about token efficiencies and everything... said they had no idea what the problem was, etc... and then bam, once China starts releasing more powerful models, they start "resetting" our token limits constantly ... sometimes ... maybe ... if we're lucky ...

I am over it.

I don't care WHAT I pay to be perfectly honest. I would have gladly paid $2,000 per month for the service I was receiving.

I just don't like being jerked around like that.

Toodles, OpenAI.

My condolences :(

> Ie. absorbing the reality that the way in which my eyes (or any optical sensor) see the world is not canonical. Vegetation is red, not green!

Pretty funny to figure out that your perspective wasn't objective reality and then immediately decide to canonicalize another arbitrary reality as the One True Reality.

Google already had the machine, this was just feeding the machine. 99% of companies do not have this machinery in place and probably wouldn't know where to start.

Yeah: Spirit Airlines didn't become ultra-awesome with the power of all its "data", it went bankrupt.

I'm not sure on how much of the flight/sales/maintenance data is being used, versus simply a big archive of emails and support calls.

Probably by emailing google, meta, OpenAI, and Anthropocene, saying you have a dataset and asking if they'd be interested.

This way you don't need to design your app to work with different aspect ratios, because it's always the same.

But you still do need to support different aspect ratios if you want your app to work on any other iPhone models, because many of them differ.

Ok? I didn't say this iphone would solve all aspect ratio issues ever. It can only solve the problem for the space it controls, e.g. itself.

that still means it's effectively useless to app developers. who here is creating apps solely for the duo?

Even if it were true you would also have to design the app for when the device is rotated.

Go win a Millenium prize then.

Sounds like you don't actually care about anything going on in the book, you're just trying to get to the end.

> I do all of my writing by hand, since it helps me think.

Later

> I wonder if long form writing will go the way of code. You and the AI agree on an outline or other high level representation, then the LLM expands it into a document.

So in the future, it won't be necessary for you to think?

Kinda. Walking the dog with me this evening, Christa saw the license plate 8531 PRI and asked me if 8531 really was prime. The 2, 3, 5 checks are automatic, and 8531-8400 = 131, which obviously isn't divisible by 7, but I would've had to check the rest of the two-digit prime factors except 97 - 8531 is greater than 90 squared, less than 97 squared, though, I reckon. So I said I don't know. But Google would know, you know? If your LLM buddy is hanging out active on your phone all the time, it can - maybe not yet, but foreseeably - answer every question, no thought required, and carry out any expressed desire.

Yeah, when I read that I just assume #1 is actually the only thing they'll focus on.