I worked in an early startup that came from 5+ years of initial academic research and selling the product was far more arduous of a process.

In academia (at least in fields that primarily use LaTeX) most people just use Overleaf.

Claude has identified itself as DeepSeek before if prompted in Chinese, is it DeepSeek?

evidence? I can't get it to do that.

Sure, here's a few reports: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47145081 https://www.reddit.com/r/DeepSeek/comments/1rd5jw7/claude_so...

No one really cares about licenses, especially now. Just use it, the odds of consequences are unfathomably low.

See 5.6, Astra, and Opus 4.8 for examples

What are they examples of? Opus 4.8 was much better than the infamous 5, and I find Astra generally competent.

Note that this is a minority position, most of the world does not live in the West and does not share your view on Mao and Che having a "strongly negative" contribution.

Good question, this was very well known. Do you have an answer?

There is no fine-print (let alone a loud banner) on the chat thread page that tells me my prompts can be used for training.

But the very fact that you go to "chatgpt.com" and write to them; "Dear Diary, today I thought.."; there is no reason they would not receive and process your data, unless explicitly promising not to (which also requires us to trust them).

The fundamental rule in this case is that if we offload our data to a cloud provider we can assume they read it, if they can, unless they promised very clearly they will not.

Every single internet connect piece of software there is probably collects telemetry at this point. Why would this be any different? You know google logs your search data as well right? Not just the companies scan it but law enforcement too.

Is there a model you didn't use because of the "safety considerations" in the model card?

Not much would go wrong.