Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | fchicken's commentslogin

Wait for 2nd gen, always

Have you seen how the average person uses their phone?

You want what, a terminal that you type on w/an onscreen keyboard?


Lots of computers have external keyboards, mice, and displays. Why not a powerful computer like the iPhone? Who cares if it's small? Lots of SBCs are small and are quite useful. This one even has a built in UPS.

You can literally use all those things with an iPhone. Including all at the same time.

So I don't know what you're complaining about?



you can connect those things though right? or you want a mouse and keyboard attached by default like a tiny laptop?

> Instead, they just hand you some poorly documented loose parts in a box and tell you, “good luck” and you’re on your own to fill the gaps.

Google is fundamentally a spy company, not a product company


All of FAANG is, if we're being cynically reductive.

Apple has a very different business model than Google (Alphabet). It's not even close to the same in terms of how they make most of their money.

It did do, but now it's putting ads in everything it will rapidly converge to the same practices to optimise shareholder value.

You're not wrong today, but they are expanding their ads department to the detriment of users: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46911901, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46322556, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22501511

Apple's own TOS allows them to datamine your data to sell you ads the same as anyone else.

I don't disagree. They're still a spy company, if we're being cynically reductive.

Is there a way to ELI5 Google's primary business model without it coming across as spying on people?

Very few have the same problem among FAANG and others.


Ads, Google is the world's largest ad company.

Internally they can do anything EXCEPT fuck with the ad revenue. If you get more ways to get data off users and ad views, good.


As if hardware companies don't quite famously include spyware in their products. Everything from phones, cars, fridges, TVs, monitors, speakers, light bulbs, laptops and everything else that supports inclusion of spyware.

I read this as "Shopify acquires Taiwan"

Poor government has to fight crime the old fashioned way.

Ridiculous.


It's just incredible how spiteful the federal government is towards its constituency


Not really. It's not like they're going after actual terrorists.


Deeper dive into the often ignored nuances of freevalve engines and why they're not in production yet


Any word on how it works? Couldn't find any info


Wow.


Not true. If you're on vacation looking to ski for 3 days, you're right in the crosshairs of the ski resort's price model, and you're not getting around it.

I also don't see how the product is superior to what was offered prior


This is an issue with all kinds of products and services, from residential university education to cars to restaurant food.

Expensive options with lots of extras that not everybody wants—and some may actively dislike—replace broadly affordable options with fewer bells and whistles. Everyone is catering to the whales and, thanks in part to our robust lending industries, trying to convince the minnows that they can be a whale too.


It's an issue with inflation calculation too. Sure, product X (house, car, whatever) is twice as big, but now it also costs twice as much - can we really say that doesn't represent inflation when the smaller, cheaper version is no longer being made?


Yes, exactly. Same issue with cellphones: They’re more powerful and have better cameras, but many people are paying more to use the same apps they used a decade ago, even though inflation numbers say they’re getting a better deal.


>Not true. If you're on vacation looking to ski for 3 days, you're right in the crosshairs of the ski resort's price model, and you're not getting around it.

That's exactly my point. If you take a 3 day family ski vacation once a year, you are the demographic whose money keeps the whole industry afloat, and allows the $600 season passes to exist.

>I also don't see how the product is superior to what was offered prior

Lifts today are a completely different thing from the 70s. You were talking single speed doubles and T-poles back then for basically everything, and there was nowhere near as much terrain developed. Getting six digit vertical days was completely unheard of. Now you take a high-speed detachable quad from base to the top, and have vastly more terrain available. Practically every major ski area has expanded massively since then.


FYI - I deleted my response after reading the post better. While as far as I can tell there has not been massive expansion in Western WA skiing inthe past 25 years, you were comparing with 1970s. I really have no idea how skiing was in Western WA in 1970s, thus I deleted my response.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: